Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch] final header fixes

[Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 21:24 +0000, Christian Limpach wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:03:19 -0600, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:40, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > This second patch looks good to me, though I would prefer
> > > to change to '#include <asm/regs.h>' from 'struct xen_regs;'
> > > as xen_regs is #define'd to pt_regs on ia64 and the explicit
> > > use of struct xen_regs in a header could cause header ordering
> > > problems later.  Will that work for ppc?
> > 
> > Ah, sure... I was just trying to avoid extra dependency trees where 
> > possible.
> > Apparently it is not possible here. :)
> > 
> > So that should be #include <public/xen.h> (which includes arch-*.h which
> > defines xen_regs). It looks like we may want to move ia64's #define to
> > arch-ia64.h ...
> 
> Could you please include asm/regs.h or public/xen.h wherever you want
> to include keyhandler.h?  Thanks.

That works great, until somebody other than me includes or modifies
keyhandler.h (or any of the other headers we've been talking about).

I guess I don't see the difficulty in making sure you include what you
use...?

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel