|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Wg-test-framework] linux 3.14.34 failure to detect disks on C600 storage controller
I'm not sure why you think there's a driver problem. We've demonstrated that
the 3.16 kernel works properly so that indicates to me that the code is
correct. It's possible that the 3.14 driver had a bug that was fixed in 3.16
but even if that is the case then the response from the driver people will be
`it's fixed, use 3.16'.
I think there is value in trying my experiment of building a 3.14 kernel based
upon a working 3.16 config file:
1) If the resulting 3.14 kernel works then it proves that we are not
fighting a driver bug (my suspicion)
2) I think the two 3.14 config files will be close enough that we can
identify the necessary config options
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 10:12 AM
To: Dugger, Donald D
Cc: Ian Campbell; wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Wg-test-framework] linux 3.14.34 failure to detect disks on C600
storage controller
Dugger, Donald D writes ("RE: [Wg-test-framework] linux 3.14.34 failure to
detect disks on C600 storage controller"):
> Well, another possibility is that the Debian 3.16 kernel has something
> builtin with `=y' that is needed, that wouldn't show up in the modules list.
That might be the case.
> Another thing you can try is to take the config file from the Debian 3.16
> kernel and use it as the base to make your 3.14 kernel. Just copy that
> config file to `.config', do a `make oldconfig', answer any questions that
> come up, build and see if that kernel works. 3.16 isn't that far away from
> 3.14 so there hopefully aren't any major changes in the configs between the
> two.
I know how to build kernels, thank you.
I could try this, but even if it fingers the configuration it wouldn't tell us
which specific option works around what I think is probably driver bug.
I am already chasing down and trying to work around several other driver and
kernel bugs affecting various machines in the new test setup. For example, the
swiotlb-related problem with Broadcom's tg3 driver. Broadcom have been
providing engineering support for that.
Can you please get in touch with someone technical at Intel and have them help
investigate ?
Obviously it is in Intel's interests to get this problem fixed, not just in
general (since it's a driver for Intel hardware) but specifically in the
context of osstest and Xen: these machines are not going into the test pool
until we can get them to work, and as a result we are not testing Xen on them.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Wg-test-framework mailing list
Wg-test-framework@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wg-test-framework
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |