WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.

To: Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.
From: Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:59:23 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:11:35 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=h+VK7bhBSgzeq2R2hJijj8mdbqy1Ia8AjuMr8SMd3W0=; b=nc1QMcE/B0bQ6Z5ha50JuFHwIZgBWNXcasjqoKE5sy2QYgBEr3y1xUW+UFMNbLws++ ///Vxtr83Wso1dd7sNfnPMzgGhtS1T8/2ZkKdVuilpum/P2GD3aHd9+RaM9GdXk3oA2Q GKdY42lRvWQzcNv88YhB4rfOUG5dKAZnKp40c=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <p06240844cabd8ed637dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAE17a0V4FC1cW3nfPX0g-cC9hhQJP+eNGUDLM7Skg216vS9JhQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240844cabd8ed637dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"You need to run your own test servers if you want a working update
since we don't test stuff like live migration (that is most basic
functionality)" makes me chuckle a bit. 2 test servers can buy
helluvah support contract, where the issues would probably be
addressed quickly. Shouldn't it be that the user tests anything that
is related to oddness of his own setup and a distro tests all that is
basic functionality?

If a upgrade from minor release A to minor release B fails like that
it's perfectly OK to come forward and say "OK that must be a
regression, sorry. Please open a bug immediately" instead of yet
another round of
Q: Xen issue in Debian
A: "blame and flame the user"


More practical:
Is there any place a user could look up which tests *are* being run continuosly?
Then a end user would have a chance to see if something he would need
is missing and define the set of additional tests he needs to do, plus
also report the results back.


Florian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users