WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: preferred XEN dom0 OS

To: xen-users <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: preferred XEN dom0 OS
From: Mike Sievers <saturngeist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:17:17 +0200
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:21:57 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TZBK0FkDWsmqKMudJL+YkqOcJaE+fSo4zZkJfQKKCpA=; b=aEpZ3xs7JQN3q7jE5EWhzVWgz/gCn8iXnGGOmQfOX55SxJ68BRyYzuZURhendqGbgJ q8gL9YaRisY7bgqT0yCvPFgvC1Xxk716jip54MmiFn+TSZV47AvA5DPF5rCwLxSATxCG 6EJhbjhHuaWLlLP7n4aaErKPcRh7YTixoAKF4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAG1y0sd5ykdz5AhGLD=P1t07JmvdXp2pzmzKRtaKP8JHLTu=yw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1314134830921-4728337.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240831ca7a50f669b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.92175ce0a7.CAAj3Djn=uCJP8_YKx=dgUd4QD6rTHW0PSAa6_xTx9BD8iRGqdw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAGnmK4xa3wzfdL=z0h-KF5QQwmghzh4sRYta_cDCQB2bsUWsoQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.421767fb10.CAAj3DjkB9OF5Wvcm+Prw_GdSHtz0GOtoMh5D1NAwx9GvPP4O2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAj3DjkB9OF5Wvcm+Prw_GdSHtz0GOtoMh5D1NAwx9GvPP4O2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAG1y0seCk8-08gv4Ej9zH1rGT6S_A+5+SYrtRAVLCPx-RVz5FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.92174f525d.CAAj3Djn0BfT3f1tjx1q6KbkeKhX0S_e9HcR_+V+Vt5PK80QF5Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAG1y0sd5ykdz5AhGLD=P1t07JmvdXp2pzmzKRtaKP8JHLTu=yw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I prefer SLES

2011/8/24 Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Grant McWilliams
>>> <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Why not just install a newer version of Xen?
>>
>>>
>>> cause I prefer stability over cutting edge, and previous experiences
>>> with using XEN that's not native to the OS has given us all kinds of
>>> horendous results. We use XEN in production so I can't really afford
>>> to try new things every now and then, and then sit with problems when
>>> an upgrade didn't go as expected.
>>
>> Actually, for that requirement you should either:
>> - stick with Centos, or
>> - go with XenServer
>>
>> Since you "prefer stability over cutting edge", I don't think any
>> newer dom0-kernel version (including the one already upstream in linux
>> kernel) will be suitable. There will be missing features (e.g. vga
>> console, blktap) and bugs. They're continually being fixed (see
>> xen-devel list archive), but I wouldn't recommend either git version
>> or current upstream kernel for production.
>>
>> It might be a different story if all xen-related features are already
>> accepted upstream (either in kernel, or in userspace qemu). But again,
>> if your concern is stability, I'd recommend to just stick with Centos,
>> or go with XenServer (even XCP might be too bleeding-edge for your
>> needs). RHEL5 is still being supported until 2014 (or 2017 if you have
>> extended life cycle support), so Centos should follow as well.
>>
>> --
>> Fajar
>>
>
> mmm, ok.
>
> What is the current native XEN version on Debian or OpenSuse? I
> couldn't find anything definate. Some sources suggest 4.0, others 4.1
> - how stable is XEN 4.x at this stage?

Ah, the million-dollar question :)

I'd like to know the answer to that as well. Is there ANY linux distro which:
- comes bundled with Xen 4.x
- comes with supported dom0 kernel (i.e. not third-party like ppa)
which supports blktap (including tap:vhd)
- supports memory resize using "xm mem-set"
- supports CPU hotplug using "xm vcpu-set" without having to do
additional settings (e.g. without having to do echo 1 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online)
- has no cirtical xen-related bug within the last 3 months

I haven't found it, which is why I say stick with RHEL/Centos if you
want "stable"

>
> And what about Slackware / Gentoo or other similar Linux distro's?
>
>
>
> My problem with CentOS is that CentOS 6 (rather RH6) doesn't have
> native XEN anymore so our upgrade path looks a bit uncertain right
> now.
>
>
> Isn't XenServer built on CentOS as well?
> What *real* benefit will I have in using XENServer instead of CentOS + XEN?
>

Mainly support. And the fact that it comes as a bundle which should
"just work" when installed on bare metal.

There are other differences as well (e.g. the userland program is
different, "xe" instead of "xm")

> We use CloudMin to manage the XEN nodes, so I don't really care too
> much about "easy management" if that's the only real difference. So,
> if someone has used both these, for anything other trying to see how
> it works, please share some experiences if you don't mind

I don't think webmin/cloudmin will work on XenServer/XCP

--
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users