| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues
no, eth0 is not directly defined, only enheritanced by br0. bellow my entire
interface confih. I have 2 nic's in my hp dl 320g6 server:
***
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 10.41.10.41
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 10.41.10.0
broadcast 10.41.10.255
gateway 10.41.10.1
bridge_ports eth0
bridge_stp on
bridge_maxwait 0
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 10.255.255.1
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 10.255.255.0
broadcast 10.255.255.3
***
eth1 I only use for drbd sync and remus.
thanks walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Ing [mailto:larry@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Montag, 1. August 2011 03:54
To: Walter Robert Ditzler
Cc: 'xenList'
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues
Hmm... I assume you still have eth0 defined as something like this
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.100
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.1
If that is the case, I can't make my host talk to the network.
this is my configuration:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.100
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.1
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 10.10.10.100
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 10.10.10.0
broadcast 10.10.10.255
gateway 10.10.10.1
bridge_ports eth0
bridge_stp on
bridge_maxwait 0
As far as switching distros... I would rather not considering I know debian
better than any other distro.
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 03:35 +0200, Walter Robert Ditzler wrote:
> why changing distribution, debian does it very well. for performance
> reason I just defined a bridged interface:
>
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
> address 10.41.10.41
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 10.41.10.0
> broadcast 10.41.10.255
> gateway 10.41.10.1
> bridge_ports eth0
> bridge_stp on
> bridge_maxwait 0
>
>
> vif = [ 'bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx' ]
>
> (network-script 'network-bridge antispoof=yes') (vif-script
> vif-bridge)
>
> thanks walter
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas
> Mishra
> Sent: Montag, 1. August 2011 03:16
> To: Larry Ing
> Cc: xenList
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Larry Ing <larry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I am trying to use bridged networking with my Xen VMs, but I am
> > unable to connect them to the network. I am running a Debian dom0
> > with Xen 4.0.1. I am not seeing a xenbr0 interface in the output of
> > "ifconfig", but I do see peth0 and eth0. Running the command "brctl
> > show" tells me that eth0 is the bridge device. In my
> > xend-config.sxp I did not name it eth0, but instead said the
> > following "(network-script 'network-bridge antispoof=yes
> > bridge=xenbr0')." How do I create the xenbr0 interface and have my
> > VMs successfully connect to
> this bridge?
> >
> >
>
> Though I did use Debian also in past but it simply has made things
> more difficult to do.
> There is some thing known as virt-viewer install it on your Debian and
> create all your VMs and their settings etc from there.My sincere
> suggestion to you will be to go with CentOS or some thing RHEL kind of
> thing if you are newbie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home