WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re[2]: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VM disk I/O limit patch

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VM disk I/O limit patch
From: Andrew Xu <xu.an@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:12:48 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:13:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110622131121.GB8216@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110622200623.8CE4.3A8D29D5@xxxxxxxxxx> <20110622131121.GB8216@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:11:21 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:06:23PM +0800, Andrew Xu wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:33:37 -0400
> > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:29:35PM +0800, Andrew Xu wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > I add a blkback QoS patch.
> > > 
> > > What tree is this against? 
> > This patch is based on suse11.sp1(2.6.32) xen-blkback source. 
> > (2.6.18 "Xenlinux" based source trees?)
> > 
> > > There is a xen-blkback in 3.0-rc4, can you rebase
> > > it against that please.
> > > 
> > Ok, I will rebase it.
> 
> Hold on, lets talk about the problem you are trying to solve first.
> > 
> > > What is the patch solving? 
> > > 
> > With this path, you can set different speed I/O for different VM disk.
> > For example, I set vm17-disk1 4MKB/s 
> >                    vm17-disk2 1MKB/s 
> >                    vm18-disk3 3MKB/s 
> > I/O speed, by writing follow xenstore key-values.
> >     /local/domain/17/device/vbd/768/tokens-rate = "4096"
> >     /local/domain/17/device/vbd/2048/tokens-rate = "1024"
> >     /local/domain/18/device/vbd/768/tokens-rate = "3096"
> > 
> > > Why can't it be done with dm-ioband?
> > Of cause, I/O speed limit also can be done with dm-ioband.
> > But with my patch, there is no need to load dm-ioband any more.
> > This patch do speed-limit more close disk, more lightweight.
> 
> I am not convienced this will be easier to maintain than
> using existing code (dm-ioband) that Linux kernel provides already.
> 
> Are there other technical reasons 'dm-ioband' is not sufficient
> enough? Could it be possible to fix 'dm-ioband' to not have those
> bugs? Florian mentioned flush requests not passing through
> the DM layers but I am pretty sure those have been fixed.
> 
I don't find dm-ioband's bug, so I can't answer your question.

But, xen-vm-disk I/O limitation shoud done by xen module, is not it?



> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel