| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze with XEN4?
|
----- Original message -----
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Sorensen
> > <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Are there any good alternatives to the network-nat script
> > > > > on Debian
> > > > > Squeeze?
>
> > I'm wondering if we should considering using a QEMU-like approach for
> > NAT on Xen going forward?
> >
> > Something like:
> > http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking/NAT
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Todd: Is this the same one used by libvirt with virbr0? Using
> something common would be nice, as it means NAT-networking can be
> treated the same way as bridge networking from Xen's perspective.
>
> Andrew: try installing virt-manager (or perhaps libvirt-bin is
> enough). It should create a bridge called virbr0, which you can use on
> domU config file (add "bridge" section to vif line).
>
> --
> Fajar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I already have bridged networking working, but would like to add NAT to my setup.. I'd rather stay away from libvirt as it has caused problems in the past. I don't see the need to have libvirt to accomplish my requirements.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home