WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] [SPAM] Xen server best configurations

To: Inas Ahmed <inas.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] [SPAM] Xen server best configurations
From: Henrik Andersson <henrik.j.andersson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:16:11 +0200
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:17:36 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JL3XUJvnyOaVyk6IVHZQTrTl/uaNy3+4xgJVGfKbeDY=; b=LcAwcOdbfsddbwnvHN+41eDMh1keN7n1rU/7FOCl+LzSseBQJZ5KHu9MCohbVfjRQd kPgg2b1dfxd2ItDabIdG/kNvmd+FH8+ECmSE0wsj1DI+NwAv9jZrn4QGd5Wq6wXXqJ/U 6p/fT+cK30s3dbhH7zZ5ixYxegDfwCDqv59M0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pg9RzIJ3sBMy++WkxRduqtHobFqEMyWxy2QkmzUgl7JoU63loVgiDrNAMqw4dz1jvW wsZk/s9qlMI2jUjlBoV2Vbr1j9R2DvwFJfpfnpzv2Hjligs8t99pVlH4PYn/oVuDjGet RATA/9rXFYj9U1ocEFFgLnkeBUGJl7ckiFAUQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Low
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=mJHRZ_iiLLU6aTX6tHQXZT27+BZ20irSzPrDB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTi=mJHRZ_iiLLU6aTX6tHQXZT27+BZ20irSzPrDB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In my opinnion, propably the best way to make sure nobody help's you, is to send same question over and over again. You obviously are in a need for answers and possibly this constant re-sending is related to that, but you are achieving nothing by doing so. 

Also, in my opinnion your messages are spam because of the same reason. 

You can of course send this exact same message for the fourth time, but you still wouldn't get any more audience or answers.

-Henrik Andersson

On 16 March 2011 07:16, Inas Ahmed <inas.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,

I have 5 servers each:

Intel Quad Core i7 2.4Gig (8 processors)
2 *1TB HDD
2*1Gig NIC
12G RAM

I installed XCP 0.5 on each and all are joining a resource pool.
Then I installed 2 Centos 5.5 VM on each XCP host and I used the following command to specify the number of vCPUs for each VM:

xe vm-param-set uuid=$VM_UUID VCPUs-max=4

xe vm-param-set uuid=$VM_UUID VCPUs-at-startup=4

//I assigned 8 vCPUs on each host for VMs.


and for RAM size I used:


xe vm-param-set uuid=$VM_UUID memory-static-max=6

xe vm-param-set uuid=$VM_UUID memory-dynamic-max=6


I knew it is wrong and I have to leave at least 512M for the host.Am I correct?

Now all my VMs are halted but when I tried xentop I found CPU(%) high and some times it reaches 100. So, is it normal? if not what is the best configuration for 2 VMs on these hosts to get the best performance and use all resources?

Please can any one provide me the best configuration for 2 VMs on XCP host like mine?

Sorry for my English !

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Inas


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users