|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> Actually this is a server issue. Patches to raise this limit to NGROUPS_MAX
> (65536 in Linux) exist for a long time. And they work well and are still
> supported:
> http://www.frankvm.com/nfs-ngroups/
>
> Permission checking is a server task. So, as long as you're using Linux NFS
> servers only you may raise that limit to 64K groups, no matter what client
> you are using.
Sorry, this is a client issue... my bad. In Debian there even exists a
package with the kernel patch: "linux-patch-nfs-ngroups"...
-- Adi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Marcin Kuk
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Freddie Cash
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs,
Adi Kriegisch <=
- Message not available
- RE: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Matej Zary
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Rudi Ahlers
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, riki
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Juergen Gotteswinter
Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Jonathan Tripathy
Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue
|
|
|
|
|