WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Pinning cpu's still suggested practice?

To: Nathan March <nathan@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Pinning cpu's still suggested practice?
From: Brian Krusic <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:04:09 -0800
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:05:19 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D34E352.2070800@xxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D34E352.2070800@xxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, in my humble opinion; yes.

I also prevent ballooning by specifying mem for my dom0 in grub.

While not on a massive scale, all my Xen boxes have been extremely reliable and fast.

- Brian







On Jan 17, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Nathan March wrote:

Back when we were first setting up our xen systems, it was recommended practice to pin the cpu's on your DomUs instead of allowing xen to manage them.

Is this still the suggested practice?

- Nathan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users