This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] XCP, technology question

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] XCP, technology question
From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:21:11 +0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:03 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymYZB6XeC10gb1Cz3dl259ftpB9mp+6NqxqIrHFdF6o=; b=Zh5zYLHI+vbBirLPoB2i2Kaq/5N3tZ/iBY4Lj3o0yG2Fx0sS/+vTY7ZXj6NeY/F8Tg H/7wRbJQzPz0u7U5aJnR8BsVH8+H3YA4VzIK+siCkgdKBw6Do8TgyTk6dkWrWCfvxB7E bIvSppdoedUXqdP9zIof44IjhUO5qXu8tm/qk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=aeY+HNpxk8L0fivUc8uJpuz1O87r5527+A4pFQzaU1N53RX5vs4KVe0YJy7ooLJQHM PLfRLgJGv2LokEwx+MEAZ0dkyVxkFLBp0hBnFwqQMfJI/JBl+X/+BKIGgCyYryO06now kQxPCBv7L8ZDEg76BHp9YagnkHyPM3K6OuP8M=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CC07A26.6080506@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4CC07A26.6080506@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
One technology I hear is limiting IOPS for guest depends on access time
to storage. If access time starts to raise (means storage near they
throughput limit) VMWare limits number of IOPS for most disk-using VMs.

I don't check this at works, but it sounds cool and I know XCP, Xen+xend
or XenServer lacks of this feature.

В Чтв, 21/10/2010 в 13:36 -0400, Vern Burke пишет:
> Hey folks!
>     I was just reading an article today that claims 'VMware still has at 
> least a "five-year, pure-technology lead on both Xen Server and Hyper-V."'
> I'm not a VMware expert myself, so I thought I'd throw the question out.
> Considering Xen Cloud Platform since it's leading XenServer, and 
> figuring the various management and operations packages rolling for XCP, 
> just exactly what, capability wise, is XCP missing in comparison to VMware?
> Vern

Xen-users mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>