Re: [Xen-users] which cpu?

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] which cpu?
From:	George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:04:23 +0400
Delivery-date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:06:01 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ujvREP2VFjFPsU7ySOgNlp9a6PCjRBr6fyMVr19KGS8=; b=OXbyT7gu0DJQVyXWi7d3Zk2o1ozEpPTTvJ+vHFHWRMFEwt9pSqwrFY+cDvIoLc+II5 3KRiXR4M19HDJrxQfRXfSb+dV3G54z9jGg3YnLavXyHkCZmECc1X+kjO2VlyAAA3LdnP LIPuKbRnVbLcHGawdk6gTNcmDJYpE9+Ql3Hoo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=VH8BmkP/5WNFmqf1hvUcACkFF8D/OIdLSLH8UjyvT9EI/6VOAFOCmeVsvaxAzx0Jfd QW9gnvAdWjYmf7Au63bgooI63IUC3H2BWPba+izgYkguDQxV1K90+nV9eMDWH5MQ9uLH MHd2KjObHA3Tj66bVfyQq3BcZVlAwGt3a2lUo=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AANLkTikVVH9H3cYHvYN7MpbeBGjy2ap6Enh-ZNWPcH0+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<AANLkTi=wDPnEF1iM4Eii9XG92WFN5y5WU9T5DEo0NcVy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=QOAB+1Tm0uOHJ83XntewKu2Uf7eJ0=i3ytjxo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikVVH9H3cYHvYN7MpbeBGjy2ap6Enh-ZNWPcH0+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I personally saw 100% dom0 load with 1.2Gb iscsi traffic for guest,
performing iozone tests...

But I belive this is more iscsi overhead, than xen blk driver.

В Втр, 24/08/2010 в 07:59 -0400, Lei Lu пишет:
> In my experience it is only dom0, domU is about 1-2% when doing heavy
> io, but dom0 can go to 20%.
> 
> Best,
> Lei
> 
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Paras pradhan <pradhanparas@xxxxxxxxx> 
> > wrote:
> >> Which cpu is hit when domU does the heavy disk IO? dom0 cpu or domU cpu? I
> >
> > Should be both.
> >
> >> can see tapdisk in dom0 eating CPU.  I have (dom0-cpus 1) setup in xen
> >> config.
> >
> > In my experience using tapdisk increase dom0 CPU load even more
> > compared to phy:/ with LVM-backed domUs.
> >
> > --
> > Fajar
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] which cpu?