On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:59:52PM -0700, kishore kumar wrote:
> I am using Ethernet Server Adapater X520 - DA2 (E10G42BTDA) Card.
> For the Device Id 0x10FB, I was able to see all the 64 Virtual Functions,
> when I run lspci command.
> But when the Device ID started showing 0x10D8, I cannot see any Virtual
> Functions, when I run lspci command.
>
So the question is what happened? How/when did it change device ID?
Did you flash/upgrade the firmware?
-- Pasi
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Rose, Gregory V
> <[1]
gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If you have an 82599EB that is using 10D8h for the Virtual Function
> Device ID then the adapter is a very old, preproduction version or else
> The correct Device ID value for an 82599EB virtual function is 10EDh.
>
> Â
>
> - Greg
>
> Â
>
> From: [2]xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:[3]xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Byrne,
> John (HP Labs)
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:22 PM
> To: kishore kumar
> Cc: [4]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; wangalalei;
> [5]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] wiki page on 10G SRIOV
>
> Â
>
> Iâ**m a bit confused with your device IDs. The 10fb device is the PCI id
> for the physical NIC; the 10d8 device is the SRIOV Virtual Function
> device created by the driver. Â With the latest xen-unstable, I have
> successfully used this NIC to create and assign the VF devices to HVM
> guests. The ixgbevf driver, which binds to the VF devices, expects
> device id 0x10ed. I simply assumed that the driver was not quite up to
> date and tweaked things to work. Â So, if you are just a bit confused,
> the following might help.
>
> Â
>
> I added the following in my modprobe.d directory to create four VF
> devices (ixgbe.conf, attached):
>
> Â
>
> options ixgbe max_vfs=4
>
> Â
>
> So, on my machine, I can see the physical NIC and the 4 VFs created.
>
> Â
>
> lspci â**n | grep 0a:
>
> 0a:00.0 0200: 8086:10fb (rev 01)
>
> 0a:10.0 0200: 8086:10d8 (rev 01)
>
> 0a:10.2 0200: 8086:10d8 (rev 01)
>
> 0a:10.4 0200: 8086:10d8 (rev 01)
>
> 0a:10.6 0200: 8086:10d8 (rev 01)
>
> Â
>
> I added the ixgbevf driver to both my dom0 and domUs. While it is a
> simple tweak to add the device id to the driver, I decided to play with
> modprobe instead and added the following to my modprobe.d directory in
> both dom0 and domU (ixgbvevf.conf, attached):
>
> Â
>
> install ixgbevf /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ixgbevf; echo "0x8086
> 0x10d8" >/
>
> sys/bus/pci/drivers/ixgbevf/new_id
>
> Â
>
> If you are working with HVM guests, there has to be a patch to  qemu as
> well. (Attached) Â You also have to add â**(pci-passthrough-strict-check
> no)â** to your xend-config.sxp. (I donâ**t think you need the
> xend-config change for PV guests.)
>
> Â
>
> Then it is simply a matter of adding the VF PCI devices to your domU
> configurations and configuring the ixgbevf devices in the guests.
>
> Â
>
> Both the ixgbe and ixgbevf drivers will generate random MAC addresses
> for the devices. What I wanted to do was to set the MAC addresses for
> the VF devices in dom0 and then my guestsâ** networking configuration
> was much easier. The physical NIC must be up. It doesnâ**t have to have
> an IP address, but if it isnâ**t up the MAC address set in dom0 will be
> lost. Iâ**ve attached my dom0 rc.local where I set the MAC addresses and
> assign the devices to pciback.
>
> Â
>
> I canâ**t swear that this is the best way to do this, but this did work.
>
> Â
>
> John Byrne
>
> Â
>
> Â
>
> From: [6]xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:[7]xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kishore
> kumar
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:16 AM
> To: Pasi KÀrkkÀinen; [8]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: wangalalei; [9]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] wiki page on 10G SRIOV
>
> Â
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Â
>
> I am facing a strange issue with my 10G 82599 PCIe device.
>
> Â
>
> The Device Id has to be 0x10FB for SRIOV to function properly, But all
> of sudden the Device IDÂ started showing me as 0x10D8, and because of
> this the SRIOV feature is not working and I cannot assign the Virtual
> Function to my guest.
>
> Â
>
> When I did lspci command it is showing me as Intel Corporation Unknown
> device 10d8 (rev 01). Previously it was showing me Intel Corporation
> 82599EB Gigabit Networking with 10FB, and I was able to assign the
> Virtual Function to my guest.
>
> Â
>
> I googled and found out that the device ID 0x10D8 is a 82599
> Unprogrammed device.
>
> Â
>
> Can any one please let me know what is happening here and how to recover
> back from this?
>
> I am totally blocked for 2 days because of this issue.
>
> Â
>
> Thank You.
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Pasi KÀrkkÀinen <[10]pasik@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:17:30AM +0000, wangalalei wrote:
> > Â Â hi all:
> >
> > Â Â Â i read intel 82576 card datasheet,and finding it saying that
> the 82576
> > Â Â can set the vf's bandwidth,
> > Â Â but when i test this card,i can not find any parameter to it
> > Â Â Â any one else notice this problem? or anyone knows whether the
> 82576
> > Â Â card can control its vf's bandwidth?
> >
>
> I think bandwidth management is a work-in-progress by Intel..
>
> -- Pasi
>
> > Â Â alaleiwang
> >
> > Â
> Â --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Â Â Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:35:57 -0700
> > Â Â Subject: Re: [Xen-users] wiki page on 10G SRIOV
> > Â Â From: [11]bodkekumar@xxxxxxxxx
> > Â Â To: [12]pasik@xxxxxx
> > Â Â CC: [13]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Â Â Yeah, I configured 64 Virtual Functions in DOM-0 Â and passthru 1
> VF to
> > Â Â assign it to the guest. Â It worked for me.
> >
> > Â Â I assign static IP to my guest and tried to ping the remote
> machine. It
> > Â Â worked for me.
> >
> > Â Â But I am wondering that ping to DOM-0 from guest makes any sense
> here?
> > Â Â Can you let me know on this? Â ping worked though from guest to
> DOM-0 as
> > Â Â well.
> >
>
> > Â Â On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Pasi KÃ*â*¬rkkÃ*â*¬inen
> <[1][14]pasik@xxxxxx>
>
> > Â Â wrote:
> >
> > Â Â Â On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:56:28AM -0700, kishore kumar wrote:
> > Â Â Â > Â Â Hi All,
> > Â Â Â >
> > Â Â Â > Â Â Can any one please let me know if there is a WIKI page
> which talks
> > Â Â Â about
> > Â Â Â > Â Â how to configure SRIOV in Xen and use Physical
> Functions  and
> > Â Â Â Virtual
> > Â Â Â > Â Â Functions ?
> > Â Â Â >
> > Â Â Â > Â Â I searched xen wiki, but could not find.
> > Â Â Â >
> >
> > Â Â Â Each virtual function should be a separate PCI device, so you
> can
> > Â Â Â passthru
> > Â Â Â them like any other normal PCI device.
> >
> > Â Â Â Did you get it to work?
> > Â Â Â -- Pasi
> >
>
> > Â
> Â --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >   Ú**Ã¥â*¬Â©+Ê**çŜ¢+é*®ç®±
> Ê*³ÚŠ*ÚÅ*»Ê*Şå*ºÊşş,Ê**Ê*ºMSNåş®ÀÅ* Ê**å®*!
> >   [2]ç«*Ã¥*»Àş*ÚÅ*Å*ïÅ**
>
> >
> > References
> >
> > Â Â Visible links
> > Â Â 1. mailto:[15]pasik@xxxxxx
>
> > Â Â 2. [16]http://3g.msn.cn/
>
> Â
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx
> 2. mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 3. mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 4. mailto:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 5. mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 6. mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 7. mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 8. mailto:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 9. mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 10. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
> 11. mailto:bodkekumar@xxxxxxxxx
> 12. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
> 13. mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 14. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
> 15. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
> 16. http://3g.msn.cn/
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Home