xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> One option may be to consider Fedora as they appear to be working to add
> Xen back in the next release:
>
> [1]http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
>
> There are also Oracle Linux and CentOS that may do something about
> including Xen.
>
Oracle is actively developing Xen.. especially pvops dom0 kernel.
And Oracle has their own Xen-based virtualization solution (Oracle VM).
-- Pasi
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Pasi Kärkkäinen
> Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 10:14 AM
> To: Steven Timm
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:04:06AM -0500, Steven Timm wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:31:48AM -0500, Steven Timm wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone yet figured out what it would take to make Xen
> >>> run on top of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 beta?
> >>> We are heavily invested in Xen under RHEL5 (actually
> >>> a redhat clone) distribution, but already the xen kernel
> >>> they are shipping with update 4 and 5 is shaky and has bugs
> >>> which they don't seem to be in a hurry to fix.
> >>>
> >>> Basically I am wondering if Redhat 6 is just going to
> >>> have benign neglect and ignore Xen, or if there is going
> >>> to be stuff built into the OS which actively mitigates
> >>> against Xen in favor of KVM.
> >>>
> >>
> >> RHEL6 won't have Xen dom0 capability.
> >>
> > Yes I know that.
> > There was a time in the past when RHEL4 didn't have it
> > either. In those days people did a lot of work to
> > patch the Xen hypervisor into a kernel that looked a lot like
> > the RedHat kernel and could run on top of RHEL4. There were
> > even RPMS of a pre-compiled kernel. That's what I
> > am trying to figure out.. are there enough people who
> > are both locked into RedHat and committed to Xen that
> > it would make sense to try some kind of effort like that again?
> >
>
> Yep.. I'm sure people will make rpms of Xen and dom0 kernel for EL6.
>
> >
> >> RHEL6 will run as Xen PV and HVM domUs though.
> >> You can use RHEL5 Xen dom0 to run RHEL6 Xen PV guests.
> >>
> >> Or you can use Citrix Xenserver, or XCP to run RHEL6 guests.
> >>
> > Site OS baselines constrain what I can do in that regard.
> > RedHat and derivatives (Scientific Linux) are only distros approved at
> > my facility
> > Unless someone comes up with a way to do an alternative
> kernel/hypervisor
> > that can run a dom0 in a RedHat OS environment (such as was the case in
> > xen 3.0.2-> xen 3.0.4 days) , there will be a lot
> > of us that are forced out of the Xen business, which is of
> > course exactly RedHat's plan. And there are a lot of apps I run
> > where KVM just doesn't cut it yet either in terms of I/O throughput
> > or in terms of reliability.
> >
>
> Both Citrix XenServer and XCP are based on RHEL5 derivatives :)
>
> But yeah.. I'm pretty sure there will be thirdparty RPMs of Xen
> hypervisor/tools
> and dom0 kernel for RHEL6. Just like there is Xen 3.4 and 4.0 for EL5..
>
> -- Pasi
>
> > Steve Timm
> >
> >
> >
> >> -- Pasi
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525
> > timm@xxxxxxxx [2]http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> > Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
> > Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Assistant Group
> Leader.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [3]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
> 2. http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> 3. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Steven Timm
- RE: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Jeff Sturm
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Steven Timm
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- RE: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Frank Pikelner
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <=
- Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Matej Zary
- Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, John Haxby
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, John Haxby
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Florian Heigl
- Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen, Grant McWilliams
|
|
|