WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] DomU - network performance and possibilities (HVM, PVM,

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] DomU - network performance and possibilities (HVM, PVM, pci-passthru, stubdom, PV on HVM...)
From: lei yang <yanglei.fage@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 21:45:27 +0800
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 May 2010 06:47:02 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:x-goomoji-body:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=OWkz1Y4PhYZJMpMWpxPAgxnddb6Gqmjnn5UTAyVj0OM=; b=J9deAbYWXE54zXzQKXwTvjHisaLrpONBly2wliREBQKfc6+NP6VCMqNGIgGwq8wQmp ZPu738+VimyKJ+9w2lF3ZpwLKwKKO7bYzevARczM1kc+BWaiEF2ZZqkFLxYvPLqd+oLL F3PrDv+FVcR/L0B542oddHDXCJsXGbGTaPu6g=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:x-goomoji-body:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=xBqHn40W2eHq6RJRCn2B6gd2DuVklCvq3Bin50sw6zRXtKtLgCotWnAFkplvHAwLrY +EQDVevpo3oXdkMleL7mKydtXg3IORB3/HHCOTP5sLNQVmUr9NJDz6viiTNozF68wWRJ HIH5wjYrXez9BkIpQw0556ZUTd+HS4EHBegs8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100518101940.GW17817@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100513131241.GI17817@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinMM8e4TiKwhJM5NkKR1SVV4tQ9SBbv9lYmh1Zm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100518101940.GW17817@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:42:15PM +0800, lei yang wrote:
>    On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>      Hello,
>
>      Matej: I didn't get your initial post to xen-users because I got
>      (automatically) unsubscribed
>      from the list, due to my email provider getting blacklisted because of
>      some spam problems,
>      but now I subscribed again..
>
>      To answer your questions:
>
>      1) No, it's not possible to use VirtIO with Xen.
>      2) Yes, it's possible to use PV-on-HVM drivers in the guest with pvops
>      dom0.
>
>      3) Take a look at:
>      [2]http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenLinuxPVonHVMdrivers
>
>      Did you already make some benchmarks? If you need good latency then I
>      think
>      PCI passthrough will help a lot there.. or Xen netchannel2.
>
>
>
>      Which one will be better for thoughput,  pci passthrogh or netchanel2?
>

pci passthrough.
 
Can you tell me why ?
Thanks
Lei
 
 
-- Pasi

>      Thanks
>      Lei
>
>
>
>      -- Pasi
>
>      Original email from Matej:
>
>      Hi,
>
>      I want to (need to) do a network performance analysis/benchmark of
>      various Xen networking solutions (analyzing the pros and cons of network
>      infrastructure virtualisation) on top of Xen 4.0.
>
>      So far I have Xen 4.0 running with various Dom0 kernels (git stable
>      2.6.32.11, git stable 2.6.31.13, mercurial 2.6.18.8, Debian distribution
>      2.6.26-2xen...want try some newer forward ported Xen kernel too).
>
>      AFAIK, there are these possibilities for DomU "architecture".
>
>      1. DomU as classic emulated HVM.
>      2. DomU as classic PVM (pv_ops kernel and Xen kernel)
>      3. DomU as classic emulated HVM with Xen PV drivers (don't know whether
>      these work with pv_ops Dom0, but for that case I have the 2.6.18.8 Xen
>      linux)
>      4. DomU as classic PVM with pass-thru PCI NICs
>      5. DomU as classic HVM with pass-thru PCI NICs (don't have IOMMU capable
>      HW :( )
>      6. DomU as HVM with stubdom (according to various papers, this should be
>      a bit faster than classic HVM DomU)
>      7. DomU as HVM with virtio drivers (is this possible in xen4.0?)
>
>      I'm interested in the latency and bandwidth performance in phys-DomU and
>      DomU-DomU scenarios (I have own tool for network latency benchmarking
>      and for bandwidth there's the Iperf :) ). Also I will try to experiment
>      a bit with the CPU pinning and schedulers in these scenarios.
>
>      Also would like to test and testbench OpenSwitch as linux-bridge
>      replacement (but I'm afraid I will not have time for this).
>
>      So my questions are:
>
>      1. Is possible to use VirtIO with XEN 4.0 (as another approach on the
>      PV-on-HVM)?
>      2. Is possible to use the Xen HVM DomU PV drivers (unmodified drivers?)
>      with pvops Dom0?
>      3. If you have some ideas or hints, I will be very thankful. :)
>
>      Regards
>
>      Matej
>
>      _______________________________________________
>      Xen-users mailing list
>      [3]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      [4]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>    --
>    "We learn from failure, not from success!"
>
> References
>
>    Visible links
>    1. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
>    2. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenLinuxPVonHVMdrivers
>    3. mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    4. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



--
"We learn from failure, not from success!"
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users