WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Success Story: debian lenny 64bit, xen 4.0, pv_ops 2.6.

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Success Story: debian lenny 64bit, xen 4.0, pv_ops 2.6.31.13, VT-d
From: chris <tknchris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:29:29 -0400
Cc: Xen-Users List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:31:00 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sQ+2Q5YmMQkOdy+iRBTgwBUqz+I3GXDahLGOrvQVCQs=; b=wuK6KTIX21BKfr8jkxoKAvEXzMC01pgwz1l/SpaRUaukTaAC6blx2warxo2n0U7E3X Z4wJ0lDauYW42YwFOUVW/q3psa4TKOKvVURCUgzt2eeMVGWvMQITKDr2v0GOCac9Mnz9 YIqJlOGmVUxNLCybS/+PrKE6b1fjsChovAqGo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=raoRRHzthe4DiKoRnyM/WWRoOEgb3uafFlcYqaKe49Yu3JrR6ZlhuIkzIs0nJxOR54 ybGsEX7DVYt7eYcvPJ6utM2LOgyJgejRdHNqpUrs5g//5ZSH7BZTBjDh01VcBd1Y6PyF 3yY/PUzcdLqFvns2sxvxkZMhJj8hWtymSTHd8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100409165752.GX1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <y2s31e44a111004090928ic3d43076j5844f509de445089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100409165752.GX1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nope, just an old habit. I didn't realize it had changed. So iommu=1
should be enough by itself? I was also curious where it says vt-d for
pv guests disabled? You cant have it for both hvm and pv at the same
time?

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:28:51PM -0400, chris wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have seen quite a bit of posts regarding Xen 4.0 on debian/ubuntu. I
>> just wanted to report that my first Xen4 install went great. I am
>> running a ASUS Z8NA-D6 Dual LGA1366 Motherboard with two Xeon 5520's,
>> 24GB ram, software raid-1. Everything seems to be working very well
>> even VT-d which is surprising :) Below is some output of my first
>> successful boot:
>>
>
> Good to hear it works!
>
>> xm info
>> http://pastebin.com/6e5EG2Tv
>>
>> xm dmesg
>> http://pastebin.com/8vwhkkph
>>
>
> (XEN) Command line: vtd=1 iommu=1 dom0_mem=512M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all
>
> "vtd=1" is old/obsolete parameter, it's not used anymore.
> Also "iommu=1" is the default in Xen 4.0.0, so that's not needed either :)
>
> "iommu=verbose" can be used to get more debugging output,
> especially if IO virtualization doesn't get enabled.
>
>> dom0 dmesg
>> http://pastebin.com/RDDVYNgK
>>
>> I used the wiki page http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 as a
>> guide and everything went well.
>>
>
> Was vtd=1 mentioned somewhere there?
>
> -- Pasi
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users