| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Link bonding problem
On Fri, March 26, 2010 2:35 pm, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 22.03.2010 um 13:39 Uhr schrieb "Matthew Law"
> <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> [..]
>> bond0 (storage and management): eth0, eth1
>> bond1 (public interface): eth2, eth3
> [..]
>> Can anybody give me some pointers as to what the issue is and how to
>> resolve it? - I currently use antispoofing with iptables and ebtables
>> which is driven by the xen scripts, so I would prefer to keep that
>> feature
>> regardless of how the bonds are handled.
>
> which bonding mode did you choose? I had trouble setting up a bridge ontop
> of
> an active/active bonding. There seems to be layer 2 problems. I choosed to
> use active/passive bonding instead which works fine for me.
I used mode4 (active/active) LACP as the switches supported it. Running
under the normal linux kernel the bonding and aggregation worked fine.
Under Xen it didn't. I still have to address it but haven't had time to
look at it yet.
Thank you to everyone who replied -I will figure out what it is and let
the list know for reference.
Cheers,
Matt.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home