WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] amd-v -- passthrough supported?

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] amd-v -- passthrough supported?
From: 0bo0 <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:22:34 -0800
Cc: Xen User-List <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:24:14 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5HRgV8XI8svg0BDsnE5zbdfAdUhIHjz6ryRHqZEoWXE=; b=FtmBxWGrh5QKkwIukrXl4OSNCD5cgupgmodK02dvfoG11lRARNZE85GfowL5uGL5rR FwvZ7J6CuRQ27EuyPPchmYkswlq4BTUGPIDd0l+a+G4YSf4vbcd+3eSBLTsp0Z8qySK1 IJ0zolp9QtGmhFT/dUHoAFSMxydXOeVB4HsiE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qSPaDhZj5q/Hx8fMgMGNnH49XOs/KUWrIqzaoP0/pfE0NokkiP2+Tw+mKXCyssvViA q06xJCjEel8L6NMl3x+K/3wcHXLtWlu9r0Hi/qc5nKJlaVnkIhM76iI25rMKvh3A35Nk 91MWWRq5HZhIeIfKJWkjfH5Q9vKdpsKRL0DGw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100125210548.GY2861@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c67eed301001250916k1abd77e9kaa9f58e02c025fd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125180042.GU2861@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001251051n4e986c91i8a65c623de8aed3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125203858.GX2861@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001251254k2b0b150uefed5a48a457f155@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125210548.GY2861@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> not trying to be difficult here, just seems like the finger's being
>> pointed at something that's not relevant to my situtation ....
>>
>
> Well maybe you should point it out to be a regression compared to previous 
> functionality..
>
> ie. when you don't use VT-d.

tbh, because i'm not sure what is, isn't a regression.  or what
is/isn't to be expected.

the relevant thread/comment @xen-devel,

  http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-01/msg00870.html

i find totally confusing.  sooo ... i brought the question "here" to
get some understanding/clarity before making further statements there.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users