[Xen-users] PV OR HVM?

To:	Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] PV OR HVM?
From:	chris <khris4@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:54:52 -0700
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:55:38 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MrU/jxL+JgetJ/Ah5lbtChd9rUfvE1sSrU2BuXBoc5I=; b=f2zFWyygFacYqSqZefZGZn5Cnf5w5l1jOKzi6kHrLC5iZtay350BKVekTEQpHLxIb4 cbuY745g8EaDK3X7BBvKbq/wwqLzxGN91nV4B01cwI0HNLAT6pI9v3FoSoeimX6RQ7Jk EqdHikvObDxLR6E8+G4Y4jLVwMTZ7FzD+TrE4=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=F5Z3aBTyQYqhvb/ncV0m9Q6+ol9prKGlS3wIGnlEEA6ZXOdlodlDEPfqUsQwmBWU9C ncLoA+aXm1zGx2VuqacHAO2f7QKtXuNi4+IwGB5y3n4lwJgLgOr72ohEX+K3czFkcFzk jV7Geeiu1+tH3eS1PnfvKbOLk2n1wzFJAKmAA=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello Guy's

I want to thank everyone out there that has given me there input on using xen. I want to ask what you give close to native speed when you using linux as a domU. Would pv be faster then Hardware virtualization using xen or paravirtual is faster because it works with xen kenern in a dom0? Just let eveyone know my servers can do both hvm and para-virtualization

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] PV OR HVM?