 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Difference between xenified and pv_ops kernel
| To: | Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Difference between xenified and pv_ops kernel |
| From: | Peter Braun <xenware@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:05:56 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:06:41 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e2JAa3O8fwWZb51ovnou3+MnHAaWxIjmhdcaFI1evFk=; b=nmqFILkDiDVKr//ZwoI/FHYG4Hejg7CTw9e9gMfMqeMnmTTV2bqxwi+wpyUVmksIJo gH6xqhN6ABpzBkjLeMJP2yhc/6ON5LJUwkNDVgEBQTQ5xPVmnJDtU0Qvh2KvZmEnm5O2 Ti5EjFmzWybWUBCo9V7YnZMnLcDLVCV2WPx4A= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uRBJCYllOrfJm6xx4MfLoJHJze5upVIKYWtFKFOVCUPVhIqdt3zGKk5kQss346LUL9 pgST0ghPsdyGQ3VHs8GpG5mesTFHZPo4as/EOEb2RfZlahYclQXmKTljj2loozrGUtE8 /70eB84PTXJieoJbDl9jvsKbSVddssNNsN/7U= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi,
we have successfully tried to run both xenified and pv_ops 2.6.30
kernels for DomU.
How would you describe the main difference between those two approaches?
What is the main difference?
Are the possibilities the same?
What about speed?
Our needs for domu are pretty low - some CPU, some RAM, lvm HDD, 1-3
virtual NICs. That's all.
Nothing like PCI/USB passtrough - just plain VPS linux machine.
Differences from our point of view:
1) pv_ops can be used even with latest 2.6.31-rcX kernels
2) xenified kernel currently with 2.6.30.2 only
3) in XM TOP idling VPS with xenified kernel is really not consuming
CPU(secs) while
VPS with pv_ops kernel is always using like 1-3% of CPU even when
guest OS idle.
Thanks for your opinion
Br
Peter
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Why xen 3.4.x doesn't works on server with this controler Symbios Logic SAS1064ET PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS, For@ll |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Why xen 3.4.x doesn't works on server with this controler Symbios Logic SAS1064ET PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Таможенное оформление., Ошибки при осуществлении ВЭД |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Difference between xenified and pv_ops kernel, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
