WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] dealing with "eth0: received packet with own address as sour

To: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] dealing with "eth0: received packet with own address as source address"
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:06:56 +0700
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:08:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Usually I use a dedicated NIC for dom0 management, with another NIC
using vlans for domU, and bridges created using Redhat's
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. All works great.

Now I'm testing a new machine with Xen 3.4, using only one NIC for
both dom0 and domU traffic, bridged networking, IPv6 disabled. The
result was not so good: I kept on getting "eth0: received packet with
own address as source address" whenever a domU is active. Turns out
it's because domU's vif (vif1.0, vif2.0, etc) uses MAC
FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF, and it pretty much results in
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339

For dom0 part it can be "fixed" using the new network-bridge attached
in bug report (basically assigning vif0.x unique MAC address). This
does not fix domU though, as they're vif still use FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF.
I had to hack vif-bridge, adding a random MAC generator to solve this
problem.

Do you guys have this problem as well? How did you deal with it?

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users] dealing with "eth0: received packet with own address as source address", Fajar A. Nugraha <=