Mike –
Is the data in xm top not useful under the NETTX and NETRX
columns?
NAME STATE CPU(sec)
CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS
NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD
VBD_WR SSID
Domain-0 -----r
76640 2.6 4141056
24.7 no limit
n/a 8 4
0 0
0
0
0 0 2149627072
Testapp0 --b---
49090 0.5 2048000
12.2 2048000
12.2 2 1 9514776
5609343 2 241 8377726
13520754 2149627072
testapp1 --b---
76074 0.3 2048000
12.2 2048000
12.2 2 1 21574426 9824853
2 157 653875 16255860 2149627072
testapp2 --b--- 219883
4.7 2048000 12.2
2048000 12.2
2 1 37801757 25565941
2 85 3935004 40831484 2149627072
testapp3 --b---
586 0.4 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
79464 281130 2
143 5350 51614 2149627072
testapp4 --b---
545 0.7 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
62130 297314 2
789 3326 51252 2149627072
testapp5 --b---
474 0.1 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
61569 282954 2
1032 3365 51627 2149627072
testapp6 --b---
474 0.1 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
59681 255027 2 1655
3219 47924 2149627072
testapp7 --b---
475 0.1 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
59741 254684 2
1446 3209 47289 2149627072
testapp8 --b---
473 0.1 524288
3.1 524288
3.1 1 1
59287 252783 2
501 3258 48469 2149627072
Testapp9 --b---
37348 0.2 2048000
12.2 2048000
12.2 2 1 3521401 2448598
2 4 157779 4363920
2149627072
Best Regards
Nathan Eisenberg
Sr. Systems Administrator
Atlas Networks, LLC
support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://support.atlasnetworks.us/portal
From:
xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Denning
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:06 AM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] network usage gathering
I've run into a problem gathering usage for my xen virtual
systems. With my old model I used to gather all network usage via my cisco
devices using the the counters for each port. Each system had it's own port on
the switch, and I tracked network usage accordingly. Now that I'm using xen for
virtual systems, and multiple vm's share the same switch port, i'm not exactly
sure what my best option is for tracking usage.
I thought I may be able to setup vlans on the switch, and bind each vm to a
different vlan using vconfig... but it seems like there has to be a better
solution than that. Has anyone done anything like this? Any insight would be
greatly appreciated.
-- Mike