| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] MSSQL and Xen performance
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:22:26AM -0700, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> Damn you, Centos, for your old repository versions.
> I'd highly recommend looking at a newer version of XEN than 3.1 - there have
> been some major performance gains since then.
It's not standard Xen 3.1.
Redhat backported many patches from xen-unstable to Xen 3.1.2 in RHEL5/CentOS5.
-- Pasi
>
> Best Regards
> Nathan Eisenberg
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Atlas Networks, LLC
> support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://support.atlasnetworks.us/portal
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of blackc2004
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:47 AM
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] MSSQL and Xen performance
>
>
> Thanks everyone for the tips!
>
> Unfortunately I didn't get to "pick" the consultants, they came with the
> company that is doing our new ERP installation. So far I have not been happy
> with the way things are going.
>
> I am running:
> Xen 3.1.2-128.1.6.el5
> CentOS 5.2
> PowerEdge 2970 (2) Quad Core Opteron 2344HE, 4x512K Cache 1.7GHz, 1Ghz
> HyperTransport
>
> I have given 5 VCPUs and 4 gigs of RAM to the MSSQL Server, I was planning
> on increasing that within the next week.
>
> The storage backend is via iSCSI to an Equallogic PS5000.
>
> Since this is a brand new MSSQL installation (and we have never had one
> before), I do not know what the load will look like for us.
>
> I have been noticing some network performance issues in early testing and
> will be implementing some changes to the severs this weekend to see if those
> are resolved. I will also be looking into the GPLPV which have been
> suggested!
>
> Thanks again
>
>
> Dustin Henning wrote:
> >
> > Another important note regarding using Windows on Xen:
> > I am pretty sure that using multiple CPUs causes severe performance loss
> > with the GPLPV drivers provided by James Harper (to the extent that having
> > one VCPU with the drivers may net better performance than having
> > multiple).
> > However, I believe the GPLPV drivers still provide better performance with
> > multiple vcpus than not having the drivers would. This information could
> > be
> > slightly dated, but I believe it was recently mentioned by someone else on
> > the list. Regardless, some testing of your scenario options would be duly
> > diligent.
> > Dustin
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/MSSQL-and-Xen-performance-tp23435695p23448294.html
> Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home