WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips
From: Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:48:58 +0530
Cc: Xen Users <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:20:29 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t/P88z9wjchi71qT11VxGFTTCwwfVZ4Htk/kL5b4xfM=; b=HBZnB5/qbBP9FxvM68YvCIIH/W42hY9g/JVDYTJj1OKXYht6SnoqhDQ7qs1/4wNPRa jkskM3Vwd5YJ6iaAspDdjIOYenrogq8+SimnIXD0uTJJsIQVIqGWbF9BIEZKdzyI2f+I YnGxmj98eKcgzcDEWLendW1YxRuqqo4gDDsns=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=W0r8DfvWkJ5WRGu53e/7VYcpLgrpL33R1mIdFvcWBQ9E/xQ9NrW8UxF/71wP/s/GXf 85UJd2E5kyPvayUQNZaZ/Ccf0wo8La2DWknI4x7rRpl1x/FLgGP4Q1zWJyrCXrnzNr5p emxKJfu1KBS0AVGo67SnKbuq28Vq8aObPpjw0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7207d96f0904111747x49cda3b3pc24faf29af034d54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <acb757c00904090609y3975792dgd89d28e843ee9ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.ur7y4munrtqp7s@chiyo> <acb757c00904110447h25a98c63w1e86cd0fd2850785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.ur73w6jnrtqp7s@chiyo> <acb757c00904111011p23f5aff9yfad1cab32ca9847f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49E0EDD2.8060201@xxxxxxxxxx> <E4880FD0-6A69-47BD-A568-B54C45536B58@xxxxxxx> <7207d96f0904111408m458c90b4i41a815caf46a904f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00904111608m7fb4de26uac0e32e77d767a4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0904111747x49cda3b3pc24faf29af034d54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Fajar,

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Fajar,
> Is is possible for all practical purposes that we create different bridges
> for each domU ? An traffic for each of them go through their respective
> bridges ?

It would only make sense to do so when domUs are on different subnets.


Hmm... well in my case they are not in different subnets, so i guess i would just leave it. Thanks for the help.

--
regards,

Anand Gupta
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users