|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips
Hi Fajar,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Anand Gupta < xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Fajar,
> Is is possible for all practical purposes that we create different bridges
> for each domU ? An traffic for each of them go through their respective
> bridges ?
It would only make sense to do so when domUs are on different subnets.
Hmm... well in my case they are not in different subnets, so i guess i would just leave it. Thanks for the help. -- regards,
Anand Gupta
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Eljas Alakulppi
- [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Eljas Alakulppi
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Vu Pham
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Peter Booth
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips,
Anand Gupta <=
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Vu Pham
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Peter Booth
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Vu Pham
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Anand Gupta
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Simon Hobson
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: number of ips, Peter Booth
|
|
|
|
|