|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Paravirtualized vs HVM - how big is the performance gap?
Ok.
So go for a SL 4.7 installation, unless you really need the 4.3 one.
Good luck.
N.
P.S. It is from experience (and talknig with some sysadmins) that you
are better off putting a dom0 with a SL OS. Go for a centOS, fedora or
RHEL based one, and then build your SL machines on top.
Tim Edwards wrote:
Ferreira, N. L. (Nuno) wrote:
Hi Tim
I have a dom0 server running SL 5.1 (i386), and I was able to install a
SL 4.7 (i386) domU.
When you say virt-install command/libvirt do not allow, what are the
errors you are getting?
Cheers,
N.
I've looked into the virt-install command in more detail now. The
problem is that the SL4.3 installation tree has no images/xen/
directory, whereas more recent RHEL/SL 4.x (eg. 4.6, 4.7) do. The
virt-install expects to retrieve a vmlinuz and initrd.img from there.
(The error is "Invalid file location given: No such file or directory")
Tim Edwards
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--
==============================================
Nuno Ricardo Santos Loureiro da Silva Ferreira
NMR Spectroscopy Research Group
Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research
Utrecht University
Bloembergen gebouw
Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31.(0)30.253 9932
F: +31.(0)30.253 2652
E: n.l.ferreira@xxxxx
W: http://nmr.chem.uu.nl
==============================================
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|