|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] RESOLVED: bad I/O performance with HP Smart Array RAID
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Thomas Aeby <aeby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, sorry for having thought this might be a XEN issue.
Glad you solved it!
>
> Multiple Smart Array controllers are known for their really bad disk write
> performance. The controller on the machine in question is an E200i. I have
> seen many complaints from users out there that around 10-12 MB/s write
> throughput is about what one can expect from this controller and even an
> inofficial citation from HP support classifying this problem as a "feature".
>
> So far, there seems to be no real solution - a few users have successfully
> been able to improve performance by enabling the drive write caches (which
> of course is dangerous). My controller does not seem to support this option
> at all.
>
> The only real solution seems to get rid of the controller and either use the
> disks with a normal SATA-controller with software RAID (where you can expect
I considered that option once, but the thing is some (if not most) HP
servers NEEDS RAID controller and doesn't even offer plain SATA
controller. Yaiks.
> 50-100MB/s - a real performance boost) or buy a less trashy RAID controller.
>
I usually stick to the one with 512MB battery-backed cache.
Regards,
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|