| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] multiple bridges on non-addressed interfaces
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, this only actually *works* (for the domUs) if the interface is
assigned an address in dom0.
Ie:
auto eth2
iface eth2 inet static
address 172.16.2.253
netmask 255.255.255.0
up /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth2
works while this:
auto eth2
iface eth2 inet manual
up /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth2
does not.
Why don't you simply create the bridge in Lenny? Here's what I use in Ubuntu
auto br11
iface br11 inet manual
bridge_ports eth0.11
This is a bridge-on-vlan config. I don't even need to specifiy
settings for eth0 or eth0.11, Ubuntu takes care of them automatically.
If you want to bridge eth2 then something like this should work.
auto br2
iface br2 inet manual
bridge_ports eth2
Then you simply set your domU to use br2 on it's vif settings. br2 and
eth2 should be up, without any ipv4 address assigned.
Ok this works, thanks for the tip! I had thought that the Xen scripts for
setting up the bridges had some magic to hook them into Xen but apparently not.
I'm curious why it doesn't work 'the old way'; whether this is a change in
Xen or in Debian. It seems odd.
Regards,
Fajar
--
Please remember that an email is just like a postcard; it is not
confidential nor private nor secure and can be read by many other people
than the intended recipient. A postcard can be read by anyone at the mail
sorting office and expecting what is written on it to be private and secret
is not realistic. Please hold no higher expectation of email.
If you need to send confidential information in an email you need to use
encryption. PGP is Pretty good for this.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home