| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] gitco xen3.3 rpms for centos
Grant McWilliams wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:54 AM, <jonr@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jonr@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Quoting Steven Timm <timm@xxxxxxxx <mailto:timm@xxxxxxxx>>:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Brian Krusic wrote:
Hi all,
Has any one run these rpms?
If so, are they reliable for a production box?
I'm pretty conservative and usually stick with the vendor
distros, etc... but I may be missing out on some
enhancements as the current shipped version with
Centos/RHEL is Xen 3.0.3.
Don't believe everything RedHat puts in an rpm version string.
The RedHat RPM says Xen 3.0.3 but inside it is really a
significantly-
modified xen 3.1.2. at least in version 5 update 2.
That said, I have never tried the 3.3 rpms from gitco.
Would also be interested to know anyone who has.
EVERYONE's using them! I use them in production now and have had no
problems that I could attribute to the rpms themselves. Note, that I
only use the x86_64 rpms.
Grant McWilliams
we contacted the gitco guy for his SPEC files and built our own. imho,
you should do the same as it's not a good meta-idea to download
binary-only distributions from untrusted/less-trusted sources. i mean,
i'm sure that there's nothing malicious in the gitco builds
specifically, it's just a thought on practices.
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
Windows."
Now they have two problems.
nice sig
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
- jonathan
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home