WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] raid10 + lvm + domU NoGo?

To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] raid10 + lvm + domU NoGo?
From: henry ritzlmayr <xen-list@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:16:18 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:17:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi list, 

I have a fully updated CentOS 5.2 (Dom0+DomU). I wanted to do some
performance tests with Databases within a DomU (compare raid-levels).
>From the theoretical point of view raid10 should be best, but I can´t
even start the DomU when the lv sits on a raid10.  

The Error I get within Dom0 is (several of those):

raid10_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger
than 64k 1024000507 3

The DomU sees the disk just as a defekt one. 

Changing from phy to tap:aio gets the DomU running but performancewise
this is not the solution I am seeking. 

My google vodoo brought up: 

http://www.issociate.de/board/post/485110/Bug(?)_in_raid10_(raid10,f2_-_lvm2_-_xen).html

http://www.issociate.de/board/post/423708/raid10_make_request_bug:_can't_convert_block_across_chunks_or_bigger_%5B...%5D.html

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224077

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223947

So for me it looks like this is still a NoGo - right?

cheers 
Henry


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>