WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Strange virt-manager problem on sles10sp1

To: James Pifer <jep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Strange virt-manager problem on sles10sp1
From: Sadique Puthen <sputhenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:18:46 +0530
Cc: Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:50:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1219934131.21159.174.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1219931903.21159.157.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48B6B594.2090700@xxxxxxxxxx> <1219934131.21159.174.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
James Pifer wrote:
>> May be u might have statically configured same vnc port for both domu's
>> or it should have picked up the same port for both. Do u see anything
>> like this when u check "ps aux | grep vnc" and "netstat -nalp | grep 127"?
>>
>> --Sadique
>>     
>
> I definitely did not statically configure the vnc port for either one,
> but that makes sense of the display issue. BUT, I could not vnc directly
> to the system (vre04) either. So it's like it wasn't available in any
> way. 
>
> As soon as I shutdown hpd01, I could access it. I started hpd01 back up
> and now it all seems ok. 
>
> Very strange!
>   

I just remember having this problem once I configured one guest to use
static port and the another guest to use the next unused port(default)
and tarted the second guest first and the first guest after that. Both
took the same port.

--Sadique

> James
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>   


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>