Re: [Xen-users] Xen - AoE benchmarks

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>]

Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> The only reason i'm looking forward to use aoe is because the disconnection of 
> malfunctioning storage servers is better handled than with gnbd. gnbd (in "No 
> Cluster" mode) waits forever if the server dies and i had to write my own 
> programs to handle such a situation. aoe just gives i/o error, and that's 
> what i want.
>   
Is there a reason whay you're not looking at iscsi?
Redhat's iscsi-initiator-utils (from open-iscsi) has 
node.session.timeo.replacement_timeout, which
"specify the length of time to wait for session re-establishment before 
failing SCSI commands back to the application when running the Linux 
SCSI Layer error handler". I assume this is what you want.
Regards,

Fajar

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users