|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] performace of disks
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
does the choice of filesystem holding the image files make any difference?
i guess ext3 would be among the best, but only if the data isn't journalled.
also might be nice to add to the OCFS2 - GFS rivalry.
--
Javier
So far OCFS2 and GFS are dog slow in Xen. Normally you take a pretty decent hit when you use any of these over a local filesystem but under Xen the performance hit is unacceptable. If anyone has gotten either to work at a decent pace in Xen I'd like to know the methodology.
Grant -- Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|