This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Still un-answered: How-To build Xen (3.2) to override Xe

To: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Still un-answered: How-To build Xen (3.2) to override XenSource's linux-kernel (2.6.18) with a xenified kernel (your own or distribution)
From: Tim Post <echo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:48:53 +0800
Cc: Jithendra Bethur <bcj01@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:49:37 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1215407493.11816.89.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: echoreply.us
References: <717239.85740.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1215402651.5428.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1215407493.11816.89.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: echo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 00:11 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:50 +0800, Tim Post wrote:
> > You will still easily be able to produce .deb / .rpm packages of your
> > own if you use the 'checkinstall' utility or something similar.
> Please do not use checkinstall; it generates debs which do not pass
> policy checks.
> William

A lot of things can go wrong with checkinstall, such as a statically
linked 'ln' or others, since checkinstall relies on installwatch. I
should amend, do not use checkinstall for things that you plan to widely
distribute :) If you need to make a .deb / .rpm to clone your
installation on your own stuff its (usually) fine.

Also do not use it to replace Debian (proper) package names. For
instance, if you hope to make a replacement for 'coreutils', name the
package something else and take the original out of apt's reach.

I would not go as far as to say 'just don't use it', as it is a very
useful tool. If you want to set up your own trivial repository for your
company or friends to use, its fine.


Xen-users mailing list