This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-users] Should I use bridged or routed networking?

To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Should I use bridged or routed networking?
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:28:54 -0600
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:32 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1Jydar-0007lo-Ix@host-192-168-0-1-bcn-london>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1Jydar-0007lo-Ix@host-192-168-0-1-bcn-london>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Aci65ffxrHsnpkswTGaDMZD+v0i9gAAHUlEw
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Should I use bridged or routed networking?

>I’m very comfortable with Asterisk and moderately experienced with Shorewall, but still rather new to Xen and am having difficulty visualizing the proper network config to use.  Bridged? Routed? With a handful of servers and switches I’m sure I’d manage much better, but that’s not >very efficient. :-) Anyone have any suggestions?  Thanks!


I have this setup running similarly, I used a CentOS51 pv guest to run shorewall and a bridged config. So easy…

Food for thought,

Xen-users mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>