WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] HVM FreeBSD 7.0 DomU at Xen 3.2 CentOS 5.1 Dom0 (64-bit)

To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] HVM FreeBSD 7.0 DomU at Xen 3.2 CentOS 5.1 Dom0 (64-bit)
From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:00:56 +0200
Cc: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:01:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200804251220.35975.fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: SoftDux
References: <218901.60934.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200804251220.35975.fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
Freddie Cash wrote:
On April 25, 2008 12:13 pm Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Would it be possible to install HVM FreeBSD 7.0 DomU at Xen 3.2 CentOS
5.1 Dom0 (64-bit) ?

You would have to install the 64-bit version of FreeBSD. I'm told running 32-bit guests on a 64-bit hosts doesn't work in CentOS 5.1 (will work in 5.2).

I've successfully installed FreeBSD 6.3 (32-bit and 64-bit) and FreeBSD 7.0 (32-bit and 64-bit) in Xen 3.2 HVMs running on 64-bit Ubuntu Hardy using 2.4.24 for the dom0. (As well as in KVM HVMs running on Debian Lenny, 2.6.22 and 2.6.24.)

So, is this a problem with the CentOS 5.1 code? Or is it a problem with the Xen 3.2 for CentOS 5.1?

How stable is Ubuntu for this kind of setup?

--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux

Web:   http://www.SoftDux.com
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other 
technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users