WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Most stable Xen distro?

To: Mark Smith <smitty@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Most stable Xen distro?
From: Florian Manschwetus <florianmanschwetus@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:02:44 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Doug Breshears <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:59:08 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e417a7bb0804071151u4975e49bof83101ece1e27974@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47F94654.1060701@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47FA696F.40001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <e417a7bb0804071151u4975e49bof83101ece1e27974@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080305)
Even on the risk to start the usual distro-flame, i just add, my gentoo 64bit 3.2 xen runs pretty good based on 2.6.21 -xen sources.

Florian

Mark Smith schrieb:
Is there a consensus on which distro is the best for running a Xen dom0?
 I have tried Debian Etch (Xen 3.0.3/2.4.18 kernel) but it was having
problems with the domU's thinking the (virtual) hard drive was bad.
 I upgraded to Xen 3.2 hypervisor and tools (Using Etch Backports) and that
helped quite a bit (errors are not fatal but still there) but this left the
kernel untouched and I assumed that it would be best to get a kernel
compiled with the same version of hypervisor you are using.

 I then tried Ubuntu Gutsy (Xen 3.1/2.6.22 kernel) but the domU guests hang
while booting.

 I would prefer a Debian Etch dom0 but will go with whatever works best.

 So to clarify.. Is there a Xen distro package / Kernel package combination
that works best?
 I would consider compiling from scratch but I am not sure that would do any
better.

 Any suggestions?

I setup my Xen box on 3.0.1 back almost two years ago.  I tried really
hard to use a Debian dom0 but was unable to get it to work - notably
at the time it didn't have drivers for my SATA card, so I tried
building my own kernel.  Wasn't very happy with the fragility of the
setup, so I went to CentOS 4 and it worked amazingly well.

Honestly, you don't do much with the dom0.  If you're doing Xen right,
your dom0 is almost untouched.  Just sits there.  So I can highly
recommend using something that works really well (CentOS, Fedora Core,
etc) and putting Debian/Ubuntu/etc as your domUs.  That's what I do!

Just last week I updated to Xen 3.2 as well, and things are running
great right now.

Caveat lector: I am using Xen kernels I compiled myself, I am not
using any distro packaged anything.  I probably could use packaged
stuff with 3.2, but back in the 3.0.1 days, the packages weren't that
good IMO.  If you use the packages, your experience may vary.  :)



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users