WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: Xen 3.2 HVM help (was Re: [Xen-users] intel or amd?)

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Xen 3.2 HVM help (was Re: [Xen-users] intel or amd?)
From: jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:32:49 -0500
Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:33:32 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47CAC0D6.4050003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <b9f669850802290026o4e66a4e7rfc000fe6f03cb3c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C83636.4020905@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47CAC0D6.4050003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20080302_102649_598313_54196300)
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
On Sunday 02 March 2008 09:59:34 am Matthew Haas wrote:
>   I would if I were on the machine in question. As it is, it is at a
> remote location and I'm accessing it over a VPN... so unless I'm missing
> something (ie can I even use the SDL way if I'm NOT on the local
> machine's console??) I can't go this route.

If you are doing ssh with X forwarding (ssh -X hostname) over the VPN, either 
vnc or sdl will work fine.

> > vif          = [ 'type=ioemu, mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx, bridge=xenbr0' ]
>
>   Is it essential to add the "bridge=xenbr0" ?
>
>   Will networking not work in an HVM without it?
>
>   And.. with all the recent talk about bridging and Xen 3.2, I get the
> impression xenbr0 isn't used in the same capacity anymore... in which
> case, should I say "bridge=eth0" ? Or, is that referring to something
> else entirely?

Do a 'brctl show' on the dom0. Whatever bridge peth0 is attached to would be 
the one you use in the bridge= parm, or just let it default.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>