xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device
well, Joris recommandation is valid
anyway, and you will have less pains... but consider also NPIV (you will
need an newer, kernel maybe not supported and also Xen 3.1 and of course
the right HBA (4GB))
when you do not have HBA's you may use
iSCSI for your disks, but also here you must access the Storage from Dom0.
happy testing ;-)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with kind regards
Gerhard Possler
IT Architect
IBM Enterprise Linux Services
ELS
Wiki@IBM (only accessible
via IBM intranet)
| IT-Services and
Solutions GmbH
Rathausstr. 7, D-09111 Chemnitz
Geschäftsführung: Rainer Laier, Michael Mai
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Chemnitz
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 18409
http://www.itsas.de/
| gerhard.possler@xxxxxxxxxx
Mobil +49 (0) 160 90578637 |
"Joris Dobbelsteen"
<Joris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18.02.2008 16:51
|
To
| "Jan Kalcic" <jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
| xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
Subject
| RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device |
|
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jan Kalcic
>Sent: Monday, 18 February 2008 12:02
>To: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device
>
>Todd Deshane wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2008 6:34 PM, Jan Kalcic <jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> just a quick question I could not figure out. Is
there a way to
>> export a
>> PCI device to multiple VMs (para) keeping it available
>to dom0? Xen
>> version is 3.0.4.
>>
>>
>> As far as I know you can't. That is what virtual devices are
>used for
>> right?
>>
>> In what scenario would you want to grant direct access to a
>PCI device
>> in VMs and also in dom0?
>>
>Hi Todd,
>
>the PCI device which I would need to "share" is the fibre
>channel card connected to two different storage, on of this is
>the VMs repository which has to be visible to dom0 and the
>other one is the data storage for VMs which, obviously, has to
>be visibile to VMs. So the solution would be using two
>different fibre channel cards, right?
What I would do is make all storage available to the dom0 and use
regular methods to export it to the domU.
In other words: treat dom0 as a very fancy piece of hardware that's
between your kernel and the fibre-channel attached storage. For generic
solutions the Virtual Block Device should be fast enough, otherwise you
should probably consider a separate server, dedicated to that single
task.
I don't know if you are going to loose any fibre-channel advantages, but
I figure you also reduce administrative complexity to dom0's only.
- Joris
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Jan Kalcic
- RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Joris Dobbelsteen
- RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device,
Gerhard Possler <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Jan Kalcic
- RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Joris Dobbelsteen
- Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Jan Kalcic
- RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Joris Dobbelsteen
- Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Jan Kalcic
- RE: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Joris Dobbelsteen
- Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Jan Kalcic
- Re: [Xen-users] Exporting a PCI Device, Todd Deshane
|
|
|