Re: [Xen-users] XenExpress or OpenSource Xen, which is better?

[kanour <xen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:04:35 +0100 (CET), Stefan de Konink
<skinkie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Gautam Thaker wrote:
> 
>> I am just interested in running a Guest Linux OS and a guest windows XP
> OS on my "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+"
>>    machine w/ 3 Gb of memory. I don't need to run a 64 bit OS and in
> fact prefer 32 bit OS to be "main stream". I was wondering,
>> for someone like me, is it better to use the free version of commercial
> product (XenExpress) or is it better to use open source
>> Xen 3.2 release. I welcome any advise, easy of setup and stability are
> my main needs.
> 
> I think Xen 3.2 from a technical point of view will give you a better
> experience. But this assumes you are a techie and don't care for nifty
> interfaces. Btw, my advice to you is to go 64bit :) with 3.2.
> 
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

If you prefer easy setup and maintenance use Xen Server Express.

Regards,

kanour


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users