|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop
carlopmart wrote:
Comment them out and just use the pygrub.
name = "RhelUpdates"
memory = "384"
maxmem = "384"
disk = [
'tap:aio:/data/xenvmguests/rhel4updates/rhel4vol01.xvda,xvda,w' ]
vif = [ 'type=ieomu, mac=00:16:31:a5:67:13, bridge=natxenbr0' ]
vcpus = 1
on_reboot = 'restart'
on_crash = 'destroy'
sdl = 0
vnc = 1
vfb = [ 'type=vnc,vncunused=1' ]
I think that hdparm returns correcty parameters:
/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq = 0 (off)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 256 (on)
geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 156301488, start = 0
DMA it is activated, and this disk is IDE, I am not sure if I can
activate 32 bits transfer using -c1 option on hdparm.
Almost any hard drive made this millennium can use 32-bit: the IDE
defaults (more typically PATA now!) are set extremely, extremely low
performance for backwards compatible reasons, and really should be
updated. I once spent a long argument with a kernel developer about
how "the kernel picks the higher performance default!" and had to
walk him through the code that showed him, no, the kernel preserved
what it was set to the lat time it was warm-rebooted. It you actually
power off, it resets to to the lower settings and stays there until
manually reset. It led to a huge performance improvement and the cost
savings of buying a lot of big SCSI drives that had a serious kernel
compatibility issue (due to this developer's insistence on
backporting everything from new kernels instead of forward porting
their modifications to a contemporary kernel: b-r-r-r-r!
If I don't put which kernel image needs to startup on guest system
with kernel and ramdisk params, I can't start guest. Pygrub returns
a lot errors about doesn't find a valid kernel image.
Ahh. Do you have the matching kernel installed in your guest domain,
so that insmod can find them and install them? It definitely looks
like you've not successfully loaded the boot loader in a way that
grub can find it. Can you run "grub-install /dev/xvda1" from your
working DomU environment?
I will try to use a complete file image, and not sparse file ...
Cool. That's one source of performance issues to check.
ok, i have tried it using file image and not sparse file and with
hdparm -c1 option and the results are the same: all is really slowly
under dom0 ... I don't understand why...
OK. Hmm. What does "free" say, in your Dom0 and your DomU?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop,
Nico Kadel-Garcia <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1 terrible slowly on a laptop, carlopmart
|
|
|
|
|