Re: [Xen-users] how to use eth2 instead of eth0 for bridge

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:09:26PM +0200, Artur Linhart - Linux communication 
wrote:
> 
>       But as far as I know even having 1GBit network card, the
> communication of the guests (at least with HVM guests) will still ahve only
> 100 MBis, is it right? 

Nah, thats just what the model of the emulated network-card has as through-
put, you can do more with HVM as you can see from my small benching at
http://fluxcoil.net/doku.php/xen/docs .

> At least on Xen 3.1.0 this is so.. Does anybody know
> if it is a different situation by the paravirtual hosts? Can be somehow
> improved the network traffic for HVM hosts?
Use paravirtualized drivers if you can get those for the OS you are running
under HVM (my benchmark misses the case HVM/paradrivers thou, since para
is the most interesting method and HVM was just a fun here to look at).

Maybe someone has an explanation for the difference throughput
dom0->domU vs. domU->dom0 .


Christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Boot Problem with XEN 3.1., Paradox

Next by Date:

[Xen-users] virtual scsi tape?, Dylan Martin

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] how to use eth2 instead of eth0 for bridge, Artur Linhart - Linux communication

Next by Thread:

[Xen-users] xm console/vnc HVM problems, Hu Jia Yi

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]