On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Schober Walter wrote:
> Hello Daniel!
>
> I agree on that point below! I'd like to leave networing to the distro,
> but the thing is, that the vif0.X - vethX links do not work anymore w/o
> xend running, isn't it?a
Yes, that's the core blocking problem at the moment. Work is being
undertaken to remove need for the vethX stuff in future Xen release.
> And I read in some Howto that I should use vethX even in Dom0 because of
> priorization of traffic and penalties to DomUs, if Dom0 has IP attached
> to the xenbr directly.
>
> Anyway, I can deal with it - it's just impossible to restart xend during
> operation then, because those redhat scripts together with bonding do
> work only on clean start (ifup on bond device, where slaves already
> attached .... brrrr).
You could put some logic in the 'start' method so that it does nothing if
it detects the bonding stuff is already setup.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home