| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Kernel for 3.05-testing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Tom Mornini
> Sent: 24 April 2007 10:58
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Kernel for 3.05-testing
>
> On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:36 AM, Petersson, Mats wrote:
>
> >> Is it possible (and desirable) to build 3.05-rc2 against 2.6.18.8?
> >
> > There may be problems using the standard set of patches.
>
> I gave it a shot, and this looks like they applied cleanly...
>
> > Cannot find linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2 in path .:..
> > wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
> > linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2 -O./linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2
> > --02:49:56-- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
> > linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2
> > => `./linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2'
> > Resolving www.kernel.org... 204.152.191.5, 204.152.191.37
> > Connecting to www.kernel.org|204.152.191.5|:80... connected.
> > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> > Length: 41,842,273 (40M) [application/x-bzip2]
> >
> > 100%
> >
> [=============================================================
> ========
> > ===================>] 41,842,273 8.56M/s ETA 00:00
> >
> > 02:50:11 (8.68 MB/s) - `./linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2' saved
> > [41842273/41842273]
> >
> > rm -rf tmp-pristine-linux-2.6.18.8 pristine-linux-2.6.18.8
> > mkdir -p tmp-pristine-linux-2.6.18.8
> > tar -C tmp-pristine-linux-2.6.18.8 -jxf linux-2.6.18.8.tar.bz2
> > mv tmp-pristine-linux-2.6.18.8/* pristine-linux-2.6.18.8
> > touch pristine-linux-2.6.18.8/.hgskip
> > touch pristine-linux-2.6.18.8/.valid-pristine # update
> timestamp to
> > avoid rebuild
> > set -e
> > rm -rf ref-linux-2.6.18.8
> > cp -al pristine-linux-2.6.18.8 ref-linux-2.6.18.8
> > if [ -d patches/linux-2.6.18.8 ] ;
> > then \
> > echo Applying patches from patches/
> > linux-2.6.18.8... ; \
> > for i in $(cat patches/linux-2.6.18.8/series) ;
> > do \
> > echo ...
> > $i ; \
> > patch -d ref-linux-2.6.18.8 -p1 --quiet <patches/
> > linux-2.6.18.8/$i || exit 1 ; \
> >
> > done ; \
> > fi
>
> Agreed?
>
> This makes me a bit nervous though:
>
> > scripts/kconfig/conf -o arch/x86_64/Kconfig
> > .config:3106:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol
> > XEN_COMPAT_030002
> > .config:3107:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol
> > XEN_COMPAT_030004
> > .config:3110:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol XEN_UTIL
> > .config:3111:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol
> XEN_BALLOON
> > .config:3112:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol XEN_DEVMEM
> > .config:3113:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol XEN_REBOOT
>
> Is this related perhaps?
Don't know - my machine is still building (probably due to my utterly
slow download speed of around 25KB/s vs. your 8.5MB/s)... I'll give it a
try when it's been built.
>
> Also, is there any reason why 3.05rc2 *doesn't* default to 2.6.18.8?
Because no one asked for it before? [Most of the major players in Xen
development are from SuSE/Novell, RedHat and as such will not really
care what version of kernel - as long as it's not too far off their
choice - as they upgrade to whatever kernel their next release will be
and back/forward-port the necessary patches as needed].
>
> If not, should I submit a patch?
You could try asking the question on Xen-devel mailing list before
submitting a patch. This is really a question for Xen-devel, not
xen-users.
--
Mats
>
> --
> -- Tom Mornini, CTO
> -- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting
> -- Support, Scalability, Reliability
> -- (866) 518-YARD (9273)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home