WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] xend: not reconized RHEL5

To: "Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\)" <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xend: not reconized RHEL5
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:32:14 +0000
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:32:21 -0800
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=usT4+p9oG4cLZVoSg/Y2afe2s0IM8Cbl2iSzFmF7Kue3N3Up/Iw9Ux0+MkaxNVOmzF15x+SYTLq7EsBQzgYMvlAQF/w8XMfc5deDX24y3mkRuTbAl8Y4tlsgOP09GS1pLWohpNAqIIEdqZ43oF1twt7iCtQEwpVOaT8/8WV73lI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PLvJE+oX3LwB9Zc29IzTZZvkfkPephqUfeAzC+wdcba2dwi5KfuoBB6zvuPrbjRI0RYI2HHk93gZV1X1cUJIsIpuNooM9m04svcAw85uZ75BkZH7zX5c61hmF8QHz2WHs2N2BYyl8cX+zpWP0psKVmR4fP6tz6AHlViBZ2IQsY8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D31F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cadf36b90703060614h4098a1fdr34704c725c5d1d35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D31C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45EDBB50.9030809@xxxxxxxxx> <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D31F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) wrote:
thing is probably just to reinstall with the right install code to
begin
with.

What?

There is an installation code (a serial) one enters into the installer.
Yes, for the *BETA*.

Easiest thing is to reinstall with the correct installation code.

Joe.
Unnecessary: you can set up a local yum repository with a copy of the files on the DVD.

This is the sort of thing I've done with local downloads of the RPM's for a local yum repository, to be able to mix and match non-RedHat RPM's in a local setting and to eliminate a lot of external traffic from up2date itself, and to be able to peek into the the RPM's directly on that server. It's legal as near as I can tell as long as you have RedHat licenses on all the clients using that central repository.

I've seen and yelled at people using this stunt to distributie packages to a bunch of "licensed" machines, but unly registering the licenses when they felt like it, to effectively extend their licenses. I consider this a violation of RedHat licensing and urge people *not* to do it.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>