On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 08:44 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2007 at 15:12, bigfoot29 wrote:
>
> > Heya. :)
> >
> > Just wanted to second dom0 - crashing behavior.
> >
> > Due to the fact that I have had never the same problems with 2.0.7 (and
> > at least the same CPU/network utilization -> HDD-utilization should be
> > compareable) I can second that with 3.0.x the behavior of dom0 got bad.
> >
> > Normal uptime with 2.0.7 was up to 2 months; with 3.0.x its pending from
> > 24 hours up to a week.
>
> SLES10-x86_64:
> # uptime
> 8:39am up 97 days 17:02, 1 user, load average: 1.87, 1.83, 1.76
>
Same here except Ubuntu LTS
root@horizon2:/proc/xen# uptime
03:00:01 up 111 days, 5:33, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
root@horizon2:/proc/xen# pvscan
PV /dev/sda VG raid1 lvm2 [1.82 TB / 733.39 GB free]
Total: 1 [1.82 TB] / in use: 1 [1.82 TB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
root@horizon2:/proc/xen#
Everything is LVM backed on a 2TB raid5 array. Supporting 40+
bull-in-china-shop guests for 111 days without issue, all PV.
> Why would you run a samba server in Dom0, and did you install the recent
> security
> updates for samba?
>
Especially dom-0 with no swap :) Running any network FS without swap is
suicide. This is [ I suspect one of many ] of the cause of the "child
illnesses", not Xen.
> Ulrich
>
Best,
--Tim
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home