WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] newbie xen problens with vbd

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] newbie xen problens with vbd
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:33:22 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:33:08 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E19BE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Universitaet Regensburg, Klinikum
Priority: normal
References: <45DAC5B4.4625.59EEFCC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20 Feb 2007 at 11:51, Petersson, Mats wrote:

>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> > Ulrich Windl
> > Sent: 20 February 2007 08:56
> > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] newbie xen problens with vbd
> > 
> > On 20 Feb 2007 at 9:15, John wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > > "Error: Device 769 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not
> > > found.
> > > 
> > > This is caused by a insufficient number of loop devices.
> > > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > I wonder whether xend caould say something like "no loop 
> > device available for %s" 
> > instead.
> 
> You mean aside from the fact that it's not ALWAYS caused by lack of
> loop-devices? ;-)

I mean if the error can be isolated to a specific cause, that cause should be 
given preference over a more generic error like "something with creating the VM 
went wrong".

> 
> [I agree, there are MANY error messages that can be more clear and
> concise in Xen - and there are patches coming in now and again to fix
> error messages, but many still remain. If you feel like hacking
> something up that gives a more concise and precise description of why
> this fails, please feel free to submit a patch to xen-devel...]

Once I find time, I might actually do. Seeking... ;-)

Ulrich


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users