This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Re: flexible memory management?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: flexible memory management?
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:18:18 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:18:35 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <eqghqf$rih$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Universitaet Regensburg, Klinikum
Priority: normal
References: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE5829024F081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 9 Feb 2007 at 2:12, Sven Köhler wrote:

> > Um, remove dom0_mem=128M or set it higher.  The memory allocation is 
> > dynamic and grows down as the DomU's need it.  So set it to something like 
> > 512mb and let Xen reduce it as it needs to.
> I am amazed once again!
> Why do i read dom0_mem=XYZ everywhere?

Because Linux tried to avoud unused memory? In my case I was unable to start 
after Dom0 was working for a while, even though enough "free" memory should have
been present in Dom0 (The machine has 16GB RAM).

> Anyway, I'm testing things right now. Looking forward, to see Xen in action.

Xen-users mailing list