| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] which kernel does guest use?
Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2006 at 18:14, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:16:18 +0100
>> "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You're welcome, still, please read some docs before asking questions
>>> here that are obviously well documented.
>>>
>> I've been trying to figure out this stuff for a while now, and I
>> can state with absolute certainty that there are NO well documented
>> issues :-).
>>
>
>
That's exaclty what I'd though before posting here.
> But (I hope you'll agree): XEN uses the kernel to boot a VM that was
> specified in
> either the configuration file or command line. We'd expect people to read
> that
> much documentation before asking which kernel will be used.
>
> Another part of the documentation says that an unmodified kernel won't work
> for
> paravirtualization. That answers at least one further question.
>
>
I agree. Documentation talks about what you say but the answer to my
question is not written on doc. Just because I ask an "explanation".
As I said, I read carefully the documentation but I couldn't clearly
understand that concept. I've just asked to better understand what I
couldn't really get by myself about this new world (at least for me) of
Xen. That's it. I eventually managed to install both full and
paravirtualized machines on my system, I played with file disk and
whatever. Right now I run a virtual/virtual cluster and I did everything
from scratch. Thank documentation! So, let me say that this is not the
case of "RTFM".
Let me add a note. Honestly, I like when people want to know, people ask
and I'm happy when I can give an advice which let someone else learns
something new. Obvioulsy, I don't like when people ask something written
on the "homepage" or in the FAQ but I don't behave like "you're lazy,
you're stupid, you can't even read!!". People is allow to not understand
and I can't see the fact that someone has to be scared of posting in
mailing lists. "Did I really read all the documentation?? Did I really
check on google?? Did I spent at least two nights before posting?? Will
they think I have to be restarted??"
Nothing personal guys, but I like saying what I think. I'd take it
easier and when someone ask something really stupid, I just smile. :)
Jan
>> There may be things that seem well documented to people who were
>> into Xen at the start of the conversation, but to anyone
>> starting from scratch, it is a lot like speaking only English
>> and trying to understand two guys having a conversation in Dutch
>> next door - it sounds kind of like English, but you can't actually
>> make out any of the words.
>>
>
> I agree that the documentation of XEN still is quite poor. Maybe because it
> was a
> research project.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
>> Anyone wanting to work on improving the docs can take a look at my
>> ever evolving web page with my discoveries in sorta chronological
>> order to get an idea about what confuses a total Xen novice:
>>
>> http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/xen-fci.html
>>
> --
> Ulrich Windl
> Novell Certified Linux Professional
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home