|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Tracking DomU memory
I actually want do to something similar, but simpler. I'm only
interested in keeping track of pages that a guest domain is accessing
(both reads and writes). I'm _not_ looking for the *exact* memory
address -- just the physical page being accessed. Can log dirty be
modified to keep track of read accesses as well?
Thanks,
Diwaker
On 10/9/06, Security Initiative Team <passrete@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My main purpose is to know when a user-level application in DomU
is updating its memory.
(Tracking changes to the stack segment might be too hard due to frequent
memory updates, so maybe only the "text" segment).
I want to be able to track this from either Dom0 or the hypervisor layer,
whichever is easier.
When is ptwr_emulated_update() used and when is do_mmu_update()
used?
Thanks,
-Criag
"Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What do you ACTUALLY want to do?
log-dirty doesn't log to a file - it keeps track of "dirty" pages in a list
in memory, but doesn't actually store it in a file [ever, at all].
do_mmu_update is possibly a good place to hook into, but it depends on what
you want to do... [And it's non-trivial code, so beware of complications
from changing it].
You may want to look at ptwr_emulated_update, as that's used when the
do_mmu_update() hypercall isn't used to update a page-table-entry.
--
Mats
________________________________
--
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net/blog
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Tracking DomU memory,
Diwaker Gupta <=
|
|
|
|
|