WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Problem start iptables - udp broken

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Abel Martín wrote:

> On 11/28/06, Bill Maidment <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:22:53 +0100, Abel Martín wrote
> >
> > > I forgot to ask you. Are you trying to filter traffic for domU in
> > > dom0? If you are trying to do this with iptables and Xen bridged
> > > networking it has no sense, since a bridged device is a link layer
> > > device and iptables works above at network and trasport layer.
> >
> > I hope I'm not hijacking this thread, but what method is recommended to 
> > firewall the
> > xen0?  Is it illogical to run a bridged network if you want to firewall 
> > xen0?
> > Sorry for my ignorance. I'm still learning the ropes.
> > Cheers
> > Bill
> Well, you are right. You can use iptables in dom0 to secure domU
> (xen0). But I think it's easier to secure domU with an iptables
> ruleset inside domU, because setting a tightly secure domU inside is
> more complicated and implies the activation of IP forwarding, with is
> typical in a router/routed network environment.
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-602e26cd4a03b992f3938fe1bea03fa0fea0ed8b
>
> What I tried to say is that firewalling a domU with bridged networking
> via iptables in dom0 is weird to me. Usually you use bridged
> networking when domU is in the same network as dom0. Iptables usually
> filters traffic at network and transport layer, although you can set
> up restrictions for incoming and outgoing interfaces. You might want
> to use iptables physdev modules or ebtables to filter at link layer,
> but the last option is quite rare.
>
> I think this matter can be subject for an alternate debate: the best
> way to secure a domU. What do you think? I may have answered without
> much thinking. Maybe because I'm used to see iptables running in
> routers or hosts rather than in bridge devices, although I've seen
> them using physdev iptables module.
>
> Sorry if I confused this thread.
>


did I understand it correctly?
I can on Dom0 filter packets to Dom1, when iptables bind to Dom0:peth0
or Dom0:vif1.0 .



           Dom0  Dom1
           ----  ----

                  eth0
                   |
           eth0  vif1.0
             |     |
           -------------... Bridge
           |
         peth0
           |


if iptables run without "-i dev", default will bind to eth0.
It sees no packets from peth0 to Dom1:eth0.




On xenwiki/XenNetworking i found docu to configuration "bridging" and
"routing".
Where find I information too Pro and Contra?  (bridging vs. routing)



regards Torsten
Launoc




_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users